- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old0 q7 W6 m: O- D# S, m/ p
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical- i" k. F0 C, _( i
Exposure to Testosterone
8 {) H/ Y. h w4 p9 O6 W RSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2( P+ ~( z4 B, G$ c
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD10 _$ t V* l5 P# o
Clinical Pediatrics" f1 a! u' Z1 Y6 ?
Volume 46 Number 6% v; `7 J; }9 j" e* K) F' K4 l1 X) N8 ~
July 2007 540-5430 S( L7 U* H5 _* e
© 2007 Sage Publications
) }9 z, e6 ]( C4 I5 d10.1177/0009922806296651
5 w4 k+ F5 p& E6 qhttp://clp.sagepub.com
! \) M* S& m8 y4 H. h# f7 zhosted at
4 H1 |8 o' A/ A5 h0 H) d! y3 ~http://online.sagepub.com2 y: ]8 D A f. C
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,* {+ D1 D7 A0 Q1 E Q! Q& L" b
is a significant concern for physicians. Central
F# p0 C* L E; M# c8 w9 Cprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
. Z! S) W& I5 B# V) k% Athrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
' h6 ^; c V3 S. L3 l" sa higher incidence of organic central nervous system
& V% C8 [2 l8 ?+ C. `" nlesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested7 i) \6 Y# \' g0 M7 F3 J5 O
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
: n+ c1 t3 s$ D- |5 ~" \$ j4 Nhair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-0 s/ u" D s3 \: M; I; e/ G& _8 D
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
' S4 [- x, q. r" M2 Qreport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
) @% \% Z% t' w( qenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
# q1 M( L+ L- Q) o- _/ ~- Vment without testicular enlargement, which was due
5 @, m7 Q0 l- qto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
R8 X. i% Z, d4 k, u) gthe father. The family initially concealed this infor-
. l( `3 B; @4 D& J# N3 Wmation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
8 R, V% k6 a! q0 {7 i0 lchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of
! u! x: ]8 h' E, H. Ltestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-+ W/ X6 w; C( W
bly more common than the rare case report in the
1 i3 T# u4 k9 A3 b& |* k4 |1 |( b+ cliterature.4
+ c# B4 I& }1 K& w8 ?8 l2 ?Patient Report
* s4 y! r: l0 C9 K/ [A 16-month-old white child was referred to the4 N4 K2 M1 n& T5 r4 f
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern& W. s! f2 o) y5 v+ s8 ~( z! v
of early sexual development. His mother noticed
2 {4 r7 j$ }* \, V7 b6 V" @light colored pubic hair development when he was: X1 S y, @4 I) m% h
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
, X% Q- u/ v) ]8 v' x" @& ?South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.0 K* u0 {. ]* P0 Q" M
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
1 n- F' i: ]7 S/ A, f1 Z bProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
% W# W% Q) C( R6 \7 @; s; oMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;8 v; p, }2 H |8 Z% o2 w
e-mail: [email protected]./ \% n/ x3 m. q9 c
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became4 p( {0 p; ]! g6 s0 t9 e5 J
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-6 }" ?( P) F4 J" r6 p
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
- o' S3 ^. H- b& O- nwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with: x7 S; z! m- b8 p( U* T
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of. G% U0 U; `! j& D; I {
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
& B6 h4 q. T5 }/ }7 i2 w3 ~/ a1 ^7 Nof life and was still receiving breast milk along with
7 X, l9 g+ R& z1 J7 Csolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
& q, O) u6 I6 u* A ^# uand his psychosocial and psychomotor development
# o4 ~2 H7 R: z k0 ~was age appropriate.$ H8 q! P O$ U
The family history was remarkable for the father,2 x& @& |% M$ C, I5 V8 g" q4 a
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
k1 e; \3 S7 X* P- Z- B; ?which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
8 }) @+ R$ j ]* fheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat0 X, G; b- M6 y9 u- D; B
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.5 ^& Q2 k+ ~ p) r5 {% d( _
The father denied taking any other medication. The1 S; T2 [6 v3 S: q! c. `) p" ]1 Q
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche8 U) x Q2 ~: n' h7 ~, _+ X Q
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
( x! q1 @# S! k3 j; p5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
' P* H! P2 O1 p% U+ qcocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-. a4 P$ ~; F+ j/ I3 B
tives. There were no siblings.; c; u' q1 p& z' L# Z4 u2 f
Physical Examination
* _5 E1 m0 ]& W* W3 Y' @The physical examination revealed a very active,1 X1 `' v G. {5 B
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
4 H* a: t- c, x) Qa blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
" i% {# o0 R5 [* }8 {! w90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
& T1 i* r0 i; p/ H% V1 F, F(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth- B/ q( g) u! B- _
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
H" [! S* y1 a' [& O. mthe neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.( i) c- p, Q7 C. t# t
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
0 ] N; g9 @ i2 o2 jenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of* L- M5 I9 n2 ]5 J/ _) M ?4 L
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well% w# T9 ]0 B& E: l7 J3 }
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around" a4 j0 s% a' Q5 ?
540$ Y: J, V7 h; _
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
; D$ X4 _5 N. \the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
+ V) r+ @" p( H7 Ftesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.5 S( ]: p& A7 ~+ u
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
& \; i% |; Q/ n6 Aoily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
, Q9 I, I; _1 l8 P6 c/ wabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
4 B/ V* y/ ]* v- l$ d3 }8 JNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
' w% @2 K3 K* l5 ]) Vbilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
, u. D0 u8 N7 A7 f2 A3 j* oof papilledema.
. Y$ c8 q- R9 c! a9 C+ `( }0 ?, o/ pLaboratory Evaluation
7 m0 ?2 t! G" ^! c0 O6 SThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by
, F4 H8 A" x* x/ X# D6 v* K8 i# @using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-$ ]" i: z c+ B7 o* x
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
% c F9 N4 E: n3 H( v pkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test3 Q! d' o( k* |& i( i
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
: h {4 j2 a) d* ?lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).3 H# c& F- l" R. T1 @4 N9 J
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood5 Q1 _# L" }9 v `# e$ z
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
7 R. r, V3 v. S# ]within normal range for his age. The concentration
, ^" C* Z. M$ R/ |: D+ s. Xof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL2 v8 S+ o5 U- m% X# O" ^
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
8 L% F q1 V/ ^ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
: r9 T; B8 y8 ^' ~; I5 }terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),* b( i0 q' K* v e* v
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to, r5 U$ `* |' w2 k) K
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
; ?8 E9 g6 s4 y3 S- _( nwas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
9 a" W r; X0 J! U @2 Qtisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total1 W% N( f# w: i0 C7 m8 P6 q; M
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),; o3 }' O; _4 a
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than! [& e4 f8 {$ ^
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular0 D! ^. K7 K" L( }5 D- }
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
1 y+ [- c, D+ K0 f1 t% |+ S& tconcentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
: L6 p' T6 C; E A(prepubertal).
8 X+ A F; E+ WThe parents were notified about the laboratory
' @' B# j2 t. l8 _! M. [" c* N, Qresults and were informed that all of the tests were
+ S8 h4 ?) _1 z+ S, G$ onormal except the testosterone level was high. The# [9 x k& }! S$ @
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
: s+ a4 ^+ X/ ]! x1 l$ M, W, I% @obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
; K1 L; G1 D, v$ F3 E! Never, the family did not return for 4 months.% \: p9 C: k3 V/ `7 l
Physical examination at this time revealed that the
1 b6 d/ R9 M S2 Z* H& F, `child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
5 U! T9 J1 i( V% G8 r f1 m2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained. T) I2 q. W9 z
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-' ]8 ?. B+ w. _$ c) b
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at- y9 O5 Y) ]) L* Y
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
. N, U# d( Z& j1 w. ^3 y, {9 {+ vmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
( N. r) w( j, FThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
5 E# f4 C; ]+ l/ J" f5 e1 Ying frequent erections.
- m+ l. V P2 H7 s/ DBoth parents were again questioned about use of& o4 B9 L$ y0 U# M/ f% J0 y
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to0 l m: W8 [/ Q: y1 @
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the! ]* c0 }& I. p' K1 Q1 b Y
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541. w! A0 u) @( i Q
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-% d9 Y9 d- t" F4 d% Y
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
. ?! b3 t3 q! S& k3 ma year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
$ }3 A/ p! j# o% yto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-+ L+ u3 j- W, Y. t
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
% u0 b7 v. h" S; ~secondary to depression.
6 _" s& R% n) u' c6 @. M. [" SThe child slept in the same bed with parents.4 R7 [! [ t3 L2 ~. f& B8 w
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his0 N G! N' j, H( D0 K+ }
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-6 T2 }4 f0 o% b% w/ T
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.$ R& t1 o/ q b) }; V0 I. N
The father also admitted that after the phone call,
4 k+ c6 x5 ~' p( t0 G& f2 e) G; n8 U8 bwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby
8 d- M' d) U8 R' mwas high, he then read the product information. @0 b0 c2 ^; X% G8 F1 s- o
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
$ [* z$ _$ h% c7 B/ J: nson for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
8 M7 g3 @. C6 _& H4 o$ ?3 v( |decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the% L# Z$ Z% C& |9 A7 p! @
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had) s M& k8 ]6 Y; Y/ H
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone- Q7 b, _8 Q! B T% ]+ S6 H) e9 _
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
4 `+ W) d! D, G$ `" Dlaboratory to obtain the test., J2 q# h. w: l
Discussion' O6 ^2 j: G0 K
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary M9 q+ ^4 b, x3 j K# D
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4/ b! I6 F+ M6 l2 S4 l7 ?' a
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when3 r6 q0 |# m7 O) k( J6 M
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
# H# [1 C/ K5 x+ D! Rthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-0 u8 O3 ^7 c8 ]; n
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
R u! w: K! d6 B+ G4 amay have a central nervous system lesion that is0 v+ S6 Z7 q$ H& c, J9 z+ v: P$ B
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-9 J: h* Z7 W2 b, s0 X8 l
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
: Z! G$ E& ^& |0 |) d1 ksis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
; Y+ v* X0 c _; b- j6 f* a# @boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
, _, Z- w8 @" W( qization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-' `0 }9 N% j4 V+ ]: d3 G& z
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
1 r& b2 q. O) _7 L: @' v& Tgonadotropins.1,3$ O/ G- c! u- Q; ~: t5 Z
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-) _. }- y& d& b# A3 ]2 o
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate" V _! A) t9 a
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
) v5 P4 v) B+ y) h! J9 fexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
2 E$ P( Q% V4 D3 @, c6 ]1 i/ Dulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing% ]& x+ I1 [. M8 Y2 D4 F$ r
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
( @6 [9 |4 W2 U! Y1 g! I) B& v7 }7 Zadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
! X" Q( b- }+ `) w( F/ Zpuberty in boys.3,4
4 ], `3 _3 h# T9 H+ W; P# SThe most common form of congenital adrenal9 P3 a4 j, F0 W" @7 i5 O5 z: n3 J* j
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
; [0 O3 o& u. A& T3 |9 UThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in$ G& V% K0 A0 P% n/ O4 i% z0 P
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,' a J) p& K2 `! i; d2 {
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen: O1 k* E. |5 p1 W2 |0 | T
excess.1,3
9 D! r# ~' c; l3 dat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from0 O. [2 t1 j" ^& I& N
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007& J3 s. W) r- k# K$ f
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-4 l5 r" K9 I6 a0 i6 w, G+ }
independent precocious puberty, which is also known
' y7 Q" ~, y3 [2 yas testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
8 U% e. T) L ]( C% R' Z; Bvery young age. The physical findings in these boys
% k6 e# [! K3 Hwith this disorder are full pubertal development,
9 m) F& k) Z3 A% O8 fincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys. i( G. S. n: U" T* w' p: Y
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder) Y# O- }8 N2 n) B. u$ r3 t J6 I
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
$ P- q1 \6 X& S" {pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
/ P5 m: Y8 ]. p8 p3 N' s) B/ ereleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
3 N/ m. {; P; \9 Aautosomal dominant disorder that affects only0 W5 Y+ Q# U" r9 O2 y4 d% Q
males; therefore, other male members of the family2 b4 _! W' _7 C% t5 ~' D; c
may have similar precocious puberty.3
* d3 M9 L- q1 K4 G. \In our patient, physical examination was incon-
6 V5 X3 _6 x; F9 h) usistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
4 L2 C0 B4 k+ L0 G/ X% Dcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis9 \' e0 q" P2 ^
was in the differential diagnosis because his father/ W0 Q$ b# n4 ~2 V: V
started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
7 D( j$ j% E1 W* l, i+ I/ ntesticular enlargement is not that evident in the; d, E4 @2 q; T' }) P
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-# C! `9 ~" [1 f( R) @3 K
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
, f. v2 q) Y! g+ ]& pbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
N9 ^. {2 @; _; Q) l1 I6 Meither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase3 v+ M- F9 t! |- E y
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
- B2 t2 Y( f5 l( K" zing the normal level of adrenal steroids.1 K( R. b" m) A: `' M
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly' K7 F9 f, v+ m' f5 h( P: v
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
: `! G; q5 |, b6 n. ?9 p9 mthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-
9 A3 e; H; o. }; o! D8 l. s' h2 npearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and" u, A, Z1 {' H
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
# T' I( T. F0 g9 U- Q0 xterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was$ B$ I! C7 V4 u
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
, z% E% \+ ~! I$ R) [1 |6 NDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
2 i/ p8 n: d. C8 e( D. N! s \) kcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
$ y0 G0 x3 ^4 i! H7 x! t% T+ g% munprotected females through direct skin exposure.
, R% Y; f. x" m6 \- OSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
9 g( q: p9 F& S! m4 q4 s T4 zbaseline value in those females who were exposed to
- k% C* y: Y/ H: R; zeven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
& }5 l) Z9 z6 X% ipartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
3 x: t0 V4 v: P3 X5 q- Jtion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
8 w7 R' D9 w8 c% u' `1 \Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,* V: ~$ e4 S$ O7 z
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that. h, X/ o: Q( t" k, h. D- t3 l
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
4 l& N/ a. j- Wterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
$ x: e# L9 a( A6 _% I. h7 T( i% w2 cactive in young children exposed to testosterone
0 w: ^/ t; J4 A- Z/ p0 dexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-
2 s& m6 n& E( j4 t) o# b4 q( k( ndrotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
9 w Q- u( Y% y+ Y( {% u, Nvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in' G! k$ x( O, Y9 T+ ?% c. R; x
children results in an increase in growth velocity and
& f6 n( j: F6 f; M$ S, Jadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.' v+ a% M, Y M( m3 N6 u
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during: \% w/ \- g" H4 N, A
early childhood on pubertal development and final( I" y1 w1 R0 h3 Z& x/ y
adult height are not fully known and always remain
2 Z, [; I$ O' K) {/ Ja concern. Children treated with short-term testos-% T, b' q7 _* x6 @! C. R3 P0 u3 t* D( X
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
& }' g- x# d: A: K s H$ Racceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
! v9 E7 q. D7 B7 v. q* tcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
2 t! U+ h! {( l7 idecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
8 k# J6 j a" O: x! X6 i( z( w# }2 CThere are conflicting reports and controversy
, T4 I1 ^5 Q7 q' X2 X' [over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
3 f$ q1 l, L- u/ B" xpenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
- e' ~" C. `# t1 p5 Ladult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
; _$ K% z! q& j! ^ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
. u! D- ^: W) H, ?* l- DSutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between% `2 K9 d. T! B' e' u6 p
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
! j% t3 W' w0 H: K; J# Rpenile length in clinical studies.
# b, S! x6 G& W$ G; |Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is9 ~, e: Q- R9 k/ m( J" {' @
going to experience any of the untoward effects from/ k& a" H2 [* F; H8 J
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
+ Y3 I) K% g3 W8 [9 Z7 f7 Hthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
5 W8 N3 e. n9 g/ V+ n( J$ j& _5 zAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of
' E& U% M$ ^+ ?+ i* rdiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at, p% V* }, b1 p
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult/ m5 ?: Z$ q. S' o, g; a; Y
height will not be affected.
8 k3 _" x8 F. uAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-
# G1 O4 I# y6 @" F' ^ability of androgen products in our society may( w" u5 n% t, Z3 _
indeed cause more virilization in male or female+ o( U( W& N0 A% `
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
- n. A0 J; d- H1 W2 q5 Qgen products must be considered and specific ques-& v/ x: h8 C) d# N2 M6 k
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or' D# g- }: W) N% h. r, g/ ?
gel should be asked of the family members during
3 }% [- _3 Z' Y( ethe evaluation of any children who present with vir-1 r9 P4 _# {3 \/ C) ]
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
; `5 _0 y4 I0 G G9 dnosis can be established by just a few tests and by, V# L# f; W+ k7 m- j
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
4 w7 {: W; G9 e7 C$ whistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
# r/ Q9 ~3 ^5 G) [% f; e8 Cresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive! p2 a6 t; ^) y1 k6 S+ s9 G: |
investigation. The primary care physician should be' h8 G8 F6 P% ?7 N; B. D
aware of this fact, because most of these children/ t! h* Z6 @9 }" H0 q+ X
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’2 O4 B% P7 ~, a3 U% r3 z! @7 H0 W
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a
/ S+ ~, l1 A s( h8 Y- nwarning about the virilizing effect on a male or
' q# Y4 |! c5 C, }6 Efemale child who might come in contact with some-" w8 A5 B) }# c/ K$ U+ I7 ^
one using any of these products.+ j! `( T2 q8 P" y$ G! K
References
R- @( |4 }0 x0 e7 d/ r3 t1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
& M* J% s; v, J i5 Uand puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
6 z3 Y1 [" X+ f, N2 \Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
( Q9 B4 K3 v M; e: Y0 F7 |2002: 565-628.5 M& U# [) w/ j' Y0 F n3 j
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious. l8 z+ E) K9 q) D
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|